Resources/Case Studies & Practical Examples/Choosing a tax regime for a salaried emp…
Case study

Choosing a tax regime for a salaried employee (hypothetical)

A hypothetical salaried taxpayer compares the old and new regimes for Tax Year 2026-27.

Pending professional review. This content was drafted with Claude from official sources and has not yet been reviewed by an ArthaKara professional. Verify against the official sources before relying on it.

1. Background

Priya (hypothetical) is a 37-year-old salaried employee in Hyderabad. She pays rent and invests in PPF and health insurance.

2. Facts and assumptions

Basic salary Rs 9,00,000; HRA received Rs 3,60,000; special allowance Rs 2,40,000; rent paid Rs 3,00,000; 80C investments Rs 1,50,000; health insurance Rs 25,000; savings interest Rs 12,000; FD interest Rs 30,000; long-term gain on equity mutual fund Rs 1,50,000. Assumes Tax Year 2026-27 rates (Income-tax Act, 2025), resident individual below 60.

3. Applicable law or financial principles

New regime under section 202 and old regime provisions of the Income-tax Act, 2025; standard deduction; HRA exemption; deductions corresponding to sections 80C, 80D and 80TTA; LTCG on listed equity at 12.5% above Rs 1.25 lakh.

4. Analysis

Under the old regime, HRA exemption is the lowest of HRA received (Rs 3,60,000), rent minus 10% of salary (Rs 2,10,000) and 50% of salary (Rs 4,50,000), i.e. Rs 2,10,000. Deductions total Rs 1,85,000 (80C Rs 1,50,000, 80D Rs 25,000, 80TTA Rs 10,000). Under the new regime, these are not available, but the standard deduction is Rs 75,000.

5. Calculations

Particulars Old regime New regime
Taxable income Rs 12,47,000 Rs 16,17,000
Tax incl. LTCG and 4% cess Rs 1,50,510 Rs 1,07,300

Computed with ArthaKara's Income Tax Calculator.

6. Outcome

The new regime saves about Rs 43,210 for these figures.

7. Key learning

Large deductions do not automatically make the old regime better. Always compute both.

8. Limitations

Hypothetical figures; rules pending ArthaKara professional review; excludes employer-specific perquisites and surcharge.

9. Disclaimer

This is a hypothetical case study. Names and figures are illustrative and do not relate to any client.

Information published by ArthaKara Consulting Services is intended for general educational and informational purposes. It is based on the statutory provisions and official information referenced on the respective page as of its stated verification date. Laws, rules, notifications and regulatory interpretations may change. Readers should independently verify the applicable provisions and seek professional advice before taking action. ArthaKara is an independent professional information and consulting platform and is not a government website or government-endorsed portal.